open source · MIT★ star it on GitHubfound a bug, or want an agent supported?open an issuebuilt in the open, receipts included
skip to content
tokenchitv0.12.0 · MIT

The board

opt-in

Everyone who ran tokenchit publish, or a bare tokenchit generate, which ends by calling it. A usage count over the selected window, not a skill score.

Get your own card →
  1. 1@VinayakRai523.3B$30,187
  2. 2@veerLakshya19.4B$3,891
  3. 3@Parth08015.1B$11,085
developers
7
tokens
58.4B
equiv. cost
$45,586
verified
7 of 7

GitHub sign-in proves the handleself-reported, handle unprovedNeither audits the figures — see the notes below the table.

Developers on the board, ranked by tokens
rankdeveloperagent mixlast 30dtokensequiv. coststreak
1–@VinayakRai5✓23.3B$30,1870d
2–@veerLakshya✓19.4B$3,8910d
3–@Parth080✓15.1B$11,08511d
4–@AryanTN05✓313M$200d
5–@iyashjayesh✓149M$3160d
6–@manishreddy123✓3w97.0M$860d
7–@Sanket758✓33.4M$11d
  • codex

How this is ranked

Verified rows first, then tokens over the selected window. Signing in is the only thing that ties a row to a GitHub account, so it is the only thing that can carry a position — an unverified row still appears with its figures, it just cannot outrank a verified one. Every column covers the same window as the rank.

A cli badge means the numbers were self-reported without a GitHub sign-in; those rows stay on the board rather than being hidden, because a visible unverified row is more honest than a quietly filtered one. Streak is the current run of active days, which is not a windowed figure. Submissions far outside the range of real usage are held for review and do not appear until a person has looked. Figures are self-reported and bounded for plausibility, not audited.